Showing posts with label climate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate. Show all posts

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

Where to go in Antarctica?

Well, where to go if you can only go to Scott Base or McMurdo. Sounds obvious, right?

Maybe not... if you're a sun lover (and who isn't), you'll soak up slightly more rays at McMurdo than at Scott Base (assuming that you even go outside).

The following plot was generated by taking the sunshine energy arriving at Arrival Heights (just above McMurdo) and subtracting the sunshine energy arriving at Scott Base. Positive numbers (blue) correspond to McMurdo being sunnier, negative (green) mean SB was best. The red running line shows the 5 times exaggerated 7 day average of all years from 2000 to the present.


So, if you want to sunbathe, McMurdo's the place to pick, especially while the light is going or coming.

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Antarctic-Arctic see-saw

In recent years we've seen a large loss of sea ice in Arctic and a small increase in the Antarctic. This is a well established fact, but sometimes we are asked 'why don't they both decrease, if global warming is global?'. This is a reasonable question, and one explanation for this was found in an interesting analysis by Chylek et. al. in GRL, 'Twentieth century bipolar seesaw of the Arctic and Antarctic surface air temperatures': (http://www.agu.org/journals/gl/gl1008/2010GL042793/).

They show that over the 20th century when the Antarctic was a little warmer, the Arctic was a little cooler, and vice-versa, and explain this by suggesting that the Atlantic ocean couples the Antarctic and Arctic regions, with ocean currents sometimes sending warm water northwards away from the Antarctic (so cooling the Antarctic) through the equator and on to the Arctic (so warming the Arctic), and sometimes this not happening quite as much, making the Arctic a little cooler, and the Antarctic a little warmer.

This imposes a strong signal of warming and cooling on top of the signal from CO2 driven global warming, so we shouldn't be surprised if major changes driven by temperatures, such as the extent of summer sea ice cover, appear at one of the poles without showing up immediately at the other.